backrun vs opeq
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
backrun compared with opeq
| Detail |
backrun |
opeq |
| What it does | Private transaction RPC with rebates for Ethereum and BNB Chain
| Wallets built to resist quantum computers
|
|---|
| Stage | MVP
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Free
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Private mempool routing
- Automatic rebate payments
- Sandwiching protection
- Frontrunning prevention
- Custom RPC configuration
- No signup required
- On-chain rebate transfers
- Searcher auction mechanism
| - Hash-based signatures resistant to Shor's algorithm
- Supports Solana, Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Robinhood Chain and Elysium
- Optional multisig vault for shared control
- Bridge SOL, ETH, HYPE and USDC between networks
- One-time key system with 1024 keys per tree
- No private key on-chain for wallet address
- 448-byte signature size with NIST category 1 quantum security
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Returns arbitrage profit to users instead of bots
- No private broadcast to mempool prevents frontrunning
- Works with any wallet via standard RPC endpoint
- Rebates settle in the same block as transaction
- Beta live on both Ethereum and BNB Chain
| - Quantum-resistant cryptography using Winternitz one-time signatures and Merkle trees
- Secure key derivation with recovery words that stay valid after any rekey
- Zero-fee bridge between Solana and EVM networks
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 13 ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 1 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 0 | 13 |
5 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to backrun More alternatives to opeq