Groundfloor vs Alphathena
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Private markets investing platform offering real estate loans, notes, and emerging alternative investments | The operating system for personalized portfolio management |
| Stage | Established | Not given |
| Founded | 2013 | Not given |
| Based in | US | US |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Contact for pricing |
| Pricing | Notes: 5%-9.0% highest return, $100-$10,000 minimum investment; Loans: 10-18% target IRR, $10 minimum investment; 12 Mo Preferred Note: 8.5% fixed rate, $10,000 minimum investment; Groundfloor Bond Note: 9.5% fixed rate, $10,000 minimum investment; Music Royalties Portfolio: 7% annualized return (12 | Platform fee based on AUM tier plus basis points on direct indexing assets. A TAMP typically charges 30 to 50 basis points on all AUM it manages, while Alphathena's platform fee model means you pay for the technology and direct indexing assets, not a percentage of all assets you manage. No setup fee |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 49 +1 (up) since last check | 29 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 19 | 15 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 32 | 31 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 595 | 94 |
6 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Groundfloor More alternatives to Alphathena