Kilde vs Alphathena
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
| Detail | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it does | Private credit investment platform for accredited investors | The operating system for personalized portfolio management |
| Stage | Established | Not given |
| Founded | 2019 | Not given |
| Based in | SG | US |
| Pricing model | Paid | Contact for pricing |
| Pricing | Fixed returns 10-15% per year; 0.5% annual platform fee regardless of investment size | Platform fee based on AUM tier plus basis points on direct indexing assets. A TAMP typically charges 30 to 50 basis points on all AUM it manages, while Alphathena's platform fee model means you pay for the technology and direct indexing assets, not a percentage of all assets you manage. No setup fee |
| Key features |
|
|
| What makes it different |
|
|
| Free plan | Not given | Not given |
| Open source | Not given | Not given |
| Platforms | Not given | Not given |
| Public API | Not given | Not given |
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 28 no change since last check | 29 no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 13 | 15 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 29 | 31 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 155 | 94 |
6 details filled in for both companies.