MetaToolsLab vs QPOS
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
MetaToolsLab compared with QPOS
| Detail | 
MetaToolsLab | 
QPOS |
|---|
| What it does | Cloud-based MT5 trade copier with sub-second delivery and no broker credentials required
| Stock predictions powered by the crowd, AI bots, and market sentiment
|
|---|
| Stage | Startup
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | 2024
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | Not given
| US
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free Trial: £0.00/month (1 master, 1 slave, full features, 14 days, no card required); Starter: £9.99/month (1 master, 5 slaves); Pro: £34.99/month (2 masters, 20 slaves); Enterprise: £149.99/month (5 masters, 100 slaves); Custom: Per account pricing for 10+ masters or 100+ slaves (in development)
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Sub-second trade delivery via cloud
- No broker credentials required — EA key only
- Per-slave lot multiplier and reverse trading
- Per-slave max slippage protection
- Symbol mapping across different brokers
- Partial close handling
- Trade history with per-slave copy status
- CSV export of trade data
- Real-time dashboard monitoring
- Update EAs without reinstalling
| - AI-Genie research companion powered by Anthropic's Claude
- Over 100 AI bots with distinct behavioral styles competing each round
- Predictions for 750+ stocks
- Weekly prediction rounds with 7-day windows
- Precision scoring based on prediction accuracy
- Public leaderboards tracking accuracy
- Champions Circle recognition for top seasonal predictors
- Title progression system from Forecaster to Oracle
- Live market data and earnings calendar
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - 81% cheaper than competitors at £1.50 per slave account versus ~£8 per month
- Fully cloud-based with no VPS, local bridge, or shared machine required
- Cross-broker symbol mapping and partial close handling
- Secure authentication via revocable EA keys instead of broker passwords
| - No money at risk - predictions are purely skill-based contests
- AI and crowd predictions visible side-by-side for comparison
- Transparent, public scoring methodology and leaderboards
- Crowd wisdom aggregation showing collective market intelligence
- Lifetime accuracy tracking that never penalizes bad weeks
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | 1 ▲ +1 (up) since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 14 | 31 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 4 | 7 |
|---|
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to MetaToolsLab More alternatives to QPOS