TakeJournal vs TradeCanvas
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
TakeJournal compared with TradeCanvas
| Detail |
TakeJournal |
TradeCanvas |
| What it does | Trading journal for futures, prop-firm and copy traders
| Open-source components for trading screens, charts, order entry, and price boards
|
|---|
| Stage | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Founded | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | CZ
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Open source
|
|---|
| Pricing | Free: $0/month (1 account, no live sync); Trader: $29/month or $21.75/month billed yearly ($261/year); Pro: $49/month or $36.75/month billed yearly ($441/year); Fleet: $99/month or $74.25/month billed yearly ($891/year). Yearly plans include 3 months free.
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Live sync from TopstepX, NinjaTrader 8, and MetaTrader
- Fold copier's trades on all prop accounts into one trade
- Economic calendar with FOMC, CPI, NFP releases
| - 18 chart types with Canvas 2D or WebGL rendering
- 134 technical indicators
- 69 drawing tools including trend lines and Fibonacci
- Complete trading widget with watchlists and position tracking
- Realtime price board supporting 1,000 symbols at 30,000 ticks per second
- Order flow visualization with liquidity heatmap
- Mobile-responsive design with touch gestures
- Bar replay and paper trading
- Support for TypeScript, React, Vue and Svelte
- Works with any exchange
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - Never sends an order - read-only by design on any platform
- Folds trades across multiple accounts into one journaled decision
- Broker's own bars with 1-second data from TopstepX and NinjaTrader 8
- Copy audit finds missed copies, late fills, wrong sizes and early exits
- AI reads your journal and gives weekly reviews if you want one
| - No third-party runtime dependencies
- Headless chart at 176 KB gzipped
- Processes live ticks into indicators in microseconds
- MIT licensed and free for any market
- Performance tested: 1 million bars panned at 60 fps
|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | Not checked yet ● no change since last check | Not checked yet ● no change since last check |
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 0 | 0 |
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 11 | 10 |
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1 | 1 |
3 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to TakeJournal More alternatives to TradeCanvas