Zama® vs opeq
A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.
Zama® compared with opeq
| Detail | 
Zama® | 
opeq |
|---|
| What it does | The confidentiality protocol for onchain finance
| Wallets built to resist quantum computers
|
|---|
| Stage | Established
| MVP
|
|---|
| Founded | 2020
| Not given
|
|---|
| Based in | FR
| Not given
|
|---|
| Pricing model | Not given
| Free
|
|---|
| Pricing | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Key features | - Confidential Tokens - deposit stablecoins and receive confidential versions with encrypted balances
- Confidential Vaults - earn yield while keeping position confidential on public DeFi venues
- Confidential Swap - trade with amount, direction, and price limit encrypted
- Client-side encryption - deposits encrypted in institution's environment before batcher sees them
- Access Control List and selective disclosure for authorized viewers
- ERC-7984 confidential token standard
- Native support for any L1 or L2 blockchain
- Full verifiability and programmable compliance
| - Hash-based signatures resistant to Shor's algorithm
- Supports Solana, Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Robinhood Chain and Elysium
- Optional multisig vault for shared control
- Bridge SOL, ETH, HYPE and USDC between networks
- One-time key system with 1024 keys per tree
- No private key on-chain for wallet address
- 448-byte signature size with NIST category 1 quantum security
|
|---|
| What makes it different | - No new chain required - runs natively on existing L1 and L2 blockchains
- Full public verifiability while keeping amounts and balances encrypted
- Encryption at all times including during processing
- Programmable compliance and selective disclosure for regulators and custodians
- Open source cryptography infrastructure
| - Quantum-resistant cryptography using Winternitz one-time signatures and Merkle trees
- Secure key derivation with recovery words that stay valid after any rekey
- Zero-fee bridge between Solana and EVM networks
|
|---|
| Free plan | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Open source | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Platforms | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Public API | Not given
| Not given
|
|---|
| Community votes | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs) | 72 ▼ −1 (down) since last check | 13 ● no change since last check |
|---|
| Trust Flow (Majestic) | 21 | 0 |
|---|
| Citation Flow (Majestic) | 48 | 1 |
|---|
| Referring domains (Majestic) | 1806 | 13 |
|---|
4 details filled in for both companies.
More alternatives to Zama® More alternatives to opeq