Skip to main content
FYNORALAUNCH home

THIS SESSION · FINTECH · MONEY TOOLS

LitArbi vs Klaracase

A side-by-side comparison built from both listings. Blank cells mean the company has not given that detail; we never guess.

LitArbi compared with Klaracase
DetailLitArbi logo LitArbiKlaracase logo Klaracase
What it doesExhibit management for litigation and arbitration, with citations in Microsoft Word and hyperlinked e-briefs Legal research platform with API, MCP-Server and SDKs for German case law
StageMVP Not given
FoundedNot given Not given
Based inDE DE
Pricing modelFree trial Freemium
PricingFree during beta until 31 December 2026. After the beta: Solo €24 per month; Firm from €20 per lawyer per month billed yearly; LitArbi Server €20 per server plus €8 per user per month billed yearly. From 10 lawyers €17 per month; from 50 lawyers €12 per month. LitArbi for iPad & Android €7 per lawye Free: 0€/month (30 Credits, one-time, 30 days); Starter: 29€/month including 19% VAT (300 Credits/month); Professional: 79€/month including 19% VAT (1,000 Credits/month, API Budget prepaid at 9 ct per Credit); Enterprise: Custom pricing. Individual actions cost: Search 1 Credit, Full text of decisio
Key features
  • Exhibit numbering per party (C-, R-, CL-, CWS-, CER-, Anlage K 1, Beilage 1)
  • Exhibit citations from Microsoft Word on Mac and Windows
  • LitArbi for Word in Word on iPad and web
  • Hyperlinked submissions and stamped, paginated hearing bundles
  • LitArbi Server for teams on firm's own web hosting with PHP and MySQL
  • Files encrypted at rest and end-to-end encrypted matters
  • Two-step sign-in, roles and free guests
  • Activity log and enterprise deployment (MSI, Group Policy, MDM)
  • AI features with firm's own provider or local model
  • OCR, translation and transcription
  • REST API with OpenAPI documentation
  • MCP-Server for AI assistant integration
  • SDKs for five languages: JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, PHP, Go, Rust
  • Semantic search with AI reranking
  • Citation check for legal documents
  • Reference network between court decisions
  • Source anchoring to original documents with margin numbers
  • Research map: single question returned as map of norms and decisions
  • Agent Skills for Claude with research and citation checking
  • Full-text access to German court decisions
What makes it different
  • Files stay on your computer or firm's server, not in the cloud
  • Exhibit numbers and citations auto-update throughout the brief
  • One licence works on both Mac and Windows with shared matter format
  • Handles co-counsel Track Changes without breaking numbering
  • Citations create clickable links that travel with the brief
  • Multiple access methods unified: REST API, MCP-Server, and SDKs all use the same token and access the same data
  • Integrated with Claude and ChatGPT for AI-powered legal research
  • Data processing in Germany with optional KI processing without external services for Enterprise
  • No per-user pricing; shared credit allowance for entire organization
  • Specialized German law focus with domain-specific API endpoints
Community votes00
DR (Domain Rating by Ahrefs)Not checked yet no change since last check5 no change since last check
Trust Flow (Majestic)10
Citation Flow (Majestic)1310
Referring domains (Majestic)24

6 details filled in for both companies.

More alternatives to LitArbi More alternatives to Klaracase

Help centre